Maryland's New Drunk Driving Laws - Effective October 1, 2001
Under pressure from MADD and the Washington Post, the legislature caved in and produced a .08 per se law and a law allowing refusals in evidence, effective this fall. Since there is no scientific evidence that all individuals are intoxicated at a .08, the legislature denominated the new .08 offense, under Transportation Article § 21-902 (a)(2), as well as the non per se offense of "driving while intoxicated" under Transportation Article § 21-902 (a)(1), as "driving under the influence of alcohol per se" and "driving under the influence of alcohol." Prior to October 1, 2001, this offense required a test result of .10 or more. This yet to be defined offense carries all the criminal and administrative penalties that previously attached to § 21-902(a)(1) when it required intoxication, which was defined as "substantial impairment" of normal coordination as a result of the consumption of alcohol. The lesser offense formerly, called "driving under the influence" under Transportation Article § 21-902(b), which requires some impairment, will now be called "driving while impaired." This bill becomes effective September 30, 2001.
Under the new legislation, a breath test of .08 or more will be considered per se under the influence. A test result of .07 or more, but less than .08, will be prima facie evidence that the person is impaired by alcohol. The other inferences and presumptions contained in Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § 10-307 remain the same. For this information click on Effect of a Breath or Blood Test in Maryland.
The legislature also overruled Krauss v. State,322 Md. 376, 587 A.2d 1102 (1991). Krauss held the State could not introduce evidence of the defendant's refusal to submit to a breath or blood test for alcohol since the statute authorizing the introduction of the evidence, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § 10-309, provided that "no inference or presumption regarding guilt or innocence arises because of a refusal to submit." The new statute, which becomes effective on October 1, 2001 removes that phrase. However the new law does not indicate exactly what the effect the jury may give the refusal.
Maryland's New Drunk Driving Laws - Effective September 30, 2002
Not satisfied with the 2001 laws, the legislature has added enhanced penalties for repeat offenders in 2002. As a result of House Bill 4/Senate Bill 352 a person who is convicted a second time of driving under the influence in violation of § 21-902(a) within 5 years of a prior "a" conviction receives a mandatory one year suspension of their driver's license or privileges. There is no work permit or interlock restriction allowed for the one year. After the year the person is required to put an interlock on all vehicles they own for from 3 months to one year. They are entitled to a hearing for an Adminstrative Law Judge to determine the length of the interlock restriction and whether there is financial hardship involved with installing an interlock on more than one car.
Additionally, a second "a" conviction within 5 years of the first carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 days incarceration or 30 days community service. A third "a" conviction within 5 years carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 days incarceration or 60 days community service. Incarceration includes house arrest or in patient treatment.
Maryland's New Drunk Driving Laws - Effective January 1, 2007
Effective January 1, 2007, a person with a test result of .15 or more is no longer eligible for a work permit. Instead the applicable license or privilege suspension periods are 90 days for a first offense and 180 days for a subsequent offense. If the person needs to drive they may only continue to drive if the Administrative Law Judge grants an interlock for a minimum of one year.